Claim your CPD points
Last year 163 participants answered 20 demanding propositions put to them as if they were an Investment Analyst / Economist in the Wealth Management Investment Competition. Overall the profession did pretty well with a 62% hit rate. Some did very well - two with 100% hit rates - while others have much explaining to do! Are you willing to go again for 2017-18?
The following table shows the propositions, initial level from a year ago and the closing level. If you had answered 'No' to every proposition you would have done quite well. The correct answer was 'No' for 18 of the 20 propositions. Generally the 'Bulls' did much better than the 'Bears'.
Top ranking participants for the 2016-17 Competition
Each participant started with 20 points. Applying the scaling factors (see previous articles for the scaling factor applying to each proposition) to the responses of each participant gives a final score. The top score was 38.08. The bottom score was 7.99. The median score was 20.3.
The following table shows the top six participants in the competition. Amazingly both Colin Grenfell and Stephen Woods didn't get any proposition wrong. Colin got 18/18 with two 'unsures'. Stephen got 14/14 with six 'unsures'. Mudit Gupta got 18/20. Chao Gan got 17/19 with one 'unsure'. Adrian McGarva and Ben Trollip had identical responses. They got a super impressive 19/20, but missed out by saying 'yes' to the high scaling proposition that Japanese 10-year bond yields would remain negative. Oh, so close.
| Rank | Name | Score |
| 1 | Colin Grenfell | 38.08 |
| 2 | Stephen Woods | 34.86 |
| 3 | Mudit Gupta | 34.70 |
| 4 | Chao Gan | 34.22 |
| =5 | Adrian McGarva | 31.04 |
| =5 | Ben Trollip | 31.04 |
The person who responded 'unsure' to all twenty propositions finished on 20 points!
This Year's Competition
As with last year's competition, you will be given twenty propositions relating to investment markets. For each proposition you must answer: 'yes', 'no' or 'unsure'.
At 30 June 2018 your Portfolio Manager boss will then assess how well you have performed. Hope you do ok! It might be your last chance if you had a tough 2016-17.
Each proposition will be scaled depending on the responses from other participants in the competition. For a proposition which receives more 'yes' answers than 'no' answers, the scaling factor for a 'yes' answer that proves to be correct will be lower than the scaling factor that would be used for a 'no' answer if that had turned out to be correct.
The scaling factor to be used for each proposition is: the sum of all 'yes' and 'no' answers divided by the number of correct answers.
Those participants with correct answers for a proposition will be given 1 point multiplied by that proposition's scale factor. Incorrect answers will be given a score of zero points. Any 'unsure' answers will not affect the scale factor and will be allocated one point for that proposition.
For example, if a proposition had 30 'yes' answers and 20 'no' answers, and the correct answer was 'yes', those that answered 'yes' would get a score of 1.67 and those that answered 'no' would get a score of zero points. If the correct answer was 'no', those that answered 'no' would get a score of 2.50 and those that answered 'yes' would get a score of zero points. Those that answered 'unsure' would get 1 point.
Each participant's total score will be the sum of their scores for each of the 20 propositions. A 'market index' score will be 20 points. Can you beat the market? The winner of the competition will be the person with the highest total score. Fabulous prizes will be offered to the top three place-getters. There is nothing to lose, except for bragging rights!!
Entries must be received no later than 5.00pm Friday 11 August 2017. Enter the competition here
When entries have closed the spread of answers for each proposition will be revealed in an Actuaries Digital article. Are you bullish, bearish or just not sure?
Click here for Terms & Conditions.
The propositions that will be put to you in the survey are: