Claim your CPD points
In this year’s Investment Competition 163 participants answered 20 demanding propositions put to them as if they were an Investment Analyst / Economist. It is time for your mid-year performance review. Some have made happy their Portfolio Manager boss, while others have some explaining to do!
With the first half of the financial year complete, based on the key messages from the majority of participant views your Portfolio Manager boss has made the following comments as part of your ‘balanced scorecard’:
Your ‘balanced scorecard’ of +8 is an ‘Excellent’ outcome. Your score comprises +13 for your views that are looking as if they will be correct; -5 for your views that are looking as if they will be wrong; and 0 for the two questions that it is too early to make any comments upon.
The following tables shows the initial level of each proposition and its current status which has been used to rate you in the ‘balanced scorecard’.
Each proposition was scaled depending on the responses from participants in the competition, somewhat like a parimutuel betting pool. The scaling factors for each proposition were published during August 2016 in the following article: Wealth Management Investment Competition 2016-2017
To determine the mid-year performance for each participant, each proposition was given an assessed probability by this author. By its very nature, the assessed probabilities are highly subjective and indicative only. For each proposition, based on the assessed probability a Yes/No ‘cash-out’ factor has been calculated. It should be noted that this competition does not offer a ‘cash-out’ option to its participants, so it is only used for illustrative purposes. The ‘cash-out’ factors are shown in the following table:
Top ranking participants
Each participant started with 20 points. Applying the ‘cash-out’ factors to the responses of each participant gives a current score. At mid-year, the top score is 29.50. The bottom score is 14.37. The median score is 20.0. The following table shows the current top 5 participants in the competition.
| Rank | Name | Score |
| 1 | Colin Grenfell | 29.50 |
| 2 | Stephen Woods | 27.84 |
| 3 | Chao Gan | 27.09 |
| 4 | Mark Hancock | 26.82 |
| 5 | Mudit Gupta | 26.77 |
The person who responded ‘unsure’ to all twenty propositions remains on 20 points!
The correlations and other details
There is close relationship between the mid-year ranking of participants and how ‘bullish’ they were rated at the commencement of the competition. The bulls are winning!!
Much of the volatility between individuals that is not explained by the ‘bullish’ factor relates to the participant’s response with regard to the 10-year Japanese bond yield remaining negative. The ‘No’ response had a very high scaling factor, and so far it is ahead.
Summary
Your Portfolio Manager boss is pretty happy, but there is still a long way to go in this financial year. As we have seen during the second half of calendar 2016, anything could still happen from here!